share this article on delicious share this article on squidoo share this article on stumbleupon share this article on digg share this article on technorati share this article on reddit share this article on linkedin share this article on google bookmarks share this article on blinklist share this article on furl share this article on sphinn share this article on newsvine

Ecochic vs. SustainHillbillity

4 comments


Ecochic is supposed to be the trendy, fashionable side of living sustainably, but unfortunately in standard practice is seeming more like people getting in the SUV, driving around the corner to the local organic outlet, and buying a $100 llama sweater imported from Peru.  The sweater is purportedly made by some sustainable practice, but sounds like it’s shipped with the worlds longest carbon trail.  The word Ecochic makes me think of  a really bling covered Smartcar, a $2,500 ball gown made out of pine needles or paying $6 to drink a fancy bottle of water that came from another country.  It’s looking at a cars gas mileage and ignoring its manufacturing process – that’s more like using it as jewelry.  Followed only by ecotourism, ecolodge, and probably anything with the eco-prefix followed by some retail buzzword, this is a very low bar for changing a culture of non-stop consumerism.  $100 for a Peruvian ecosweater isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but if it’s all I’m doing for a healthier ecolifestyle my money could be better spent to encourage local organic farmers and sustainable industries.  By itself, ecochic seems to give people a false sense of ecocontributing to real ecochange.

This study found that not only are consumers feeling generally powerless to have a real impact, but also that information and awareness campaigns that give consumers information on how to act responsibly toward the environment, “tend only to influence categories of consumption with little environmental impact.”  http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/12/101217152520.htm

Also, unsurprisingly, most are unwilling to change their behavior or do not see the connection between their impact to the environment and buying things like luxury chocolate, ecochic or otherwise.

I’m finding a real lack of vocabulary for the kind of changes we’re trying to make in our life, especially words that haven’t been hijacked for some other product category.  Even “sustainability” is starting to seem more like “sustainbanality”.  You can choose your own words but I’m thinking for me it’s something like, “sustainhillbillity” – mainly due to the amount of duct tape that some of our projects use and our need to get much closer to the dirt.

Here is one study on the actual impact of bottled water from another country http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/02/pablo_calculate.php

468 ad
  1. Tom Raftery says:

    Great post Brad and so true.

    Love the term Sustainabanality btw – copyright it quick!

  2. awesome blog, do you have twitter or facebook? i will bookmark this page thanks. lina holzbauer

  3. I mistyped this web site and fortunately I discovered it again. presently am at my university I additional this to favorites so that I can re-read it later regards

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Hide me
Sign up below to join my eNewsletter
Subscribe! Email Address
Show me